Introduction to the 2006 Action Matrix
The 2006 York Conference engaged the international community in a diversity of presentations, workgroups and discussions through which a range of development challenges arose.
The matrix presented encapsulates the key priorities for action and these are listed against each of the four main conference themes.
THE 2006 ACTION MATRIX
| Theme | Policy | Practice |
| Curriculum and Pedagogy |
Improve and extend mapping exercise; Harvest interdisciplinary curriculum and 'for' |
Collect innovative and diverse approaches; create international bank |
| Entrepreneurial Outcomes |
Outcomes to policy concerns: clarify links and educate |
Refine/Fill the gaps in the existing framework |
| Institutional Approaches |
Promote top-down strategies; Strengthen partnerships between constituents, RDAs |
Support VC leaders; Find/support champions; Promote campus-wide location |
| Educator Development |
Build strong competence base; create global leadership opportunities; incentivise the community |
Build strong stakeholder advocacy base; educator development and rewards; international exchanges |
| International Relations |
Develop a global capacity for sharing and learning with Kauffman and partners |
Capture and promote international Good Practice; comparative mapping studies |
Main Conference Themes and Associated Actions
- Curriculum and Pedagogy
- Entrepreneurial Outcomes
- Institutional Approaches
- Educator Development
- International Relations
Curriculum and Pedagogy
| Curriculum and Pedagogy |
Improve and extend mapping exercise; Harvest interdisciplinary curriculum and 'for' |
Collect innovative and diverse approaches; create international bank |
The Development Agenda:
- Continue to grow the evidence base to support policy making at all levels, extending in scale and scope the existing NCGE mapping exercise.
- Pilot good practice studies from the UK and other countries providing insights into how practice relates to the delivery of entrepreneurial outcomes.
- Extend pilots to cover different contexts, cultures, and approaches within and between disciplines.
- More examples and experiences of the practice of delivering entrepreneurial learning opportunities are required.
Key Goals for the Community:
- A better evidence base and understanding of the landscape - quantitatively and qualitatively
- More experience and practice across diverse contexts captured and shared
- Curricula development 'for' entrepreneurship
- Increased levels of exchange between educators and stakeholders
Next Steps:
- NCGE to circulate the mapping template to interested partners - outside HEIs in England - to extend the scale and scope of data collection
- All community members to provide existing good practice projects, presentations and reports for uploading onto the entrepreneurship educators online website
- NCGE to categorise materials by: country; discipline and approach
- All community members to identify opportunities for further good practice studies
Entrepreneurial Outcomes
| Entrepreneurial Outcomes |
Outcomes to policy concerns: clarify links and educate |
Refine/Fill the gaps in the existing framework |
The Development Agenda:
1There is a strong desire for clarifying a set of entrepreneurial outcomes that can be operationalised at different levels in terms of individual learning outcomes and broader social and economic goals.
- It is not clear how such outcomes relate to the range of policy concerns at national, regional and institutional levels.
Key Goals for the Community:
- A shared outcomes template with broad application
- Clarity with all stakeholders of how the outcomes support key policy concerns
Next Steps:
- Through consultation further develop the existing outcomes template to meet expressed needs and create explicit levels in the template structure - for learning; activity; macro-level
- Prepare a community-led document for circulation to key stakeholders in central and regional government and across the higher education sector
- Community members to consider selected workshops and policy meetings
Institutional Approaches
| Institutional Approaches |
Promote top-down strategies; Strengthen partnerships between constituents, RDAs |
Support VC leaders; Find/support champions; Promote campus-wide location |
The Development Agenda:
- There is no single model suitable for all institutions.
- External and institutional factors affect the approach to entrepreneurship education in particular institutions.
- Enabling equal support research, teaching and for extra-curricula activity is likely to have a positive impact on the scale and scope of provision.
- Identifying and capturing the variety of institutional models and approaches will create a better understanding of what may be working in which contexts.
Key Goals for the Community:
- A diversity of institutional models captured, categorized and disseminated
- Establish Vice-Chancellor leaders in higher education as exemplars and role models
Next Steps:
- Identify top-down exemplars and set up project(s) to capture/record
- Prepare documents/materials for dissemination
- Set up high level workshop with leading exemplars: US and UK and elsewhere
- NCGE to work with the UK RDA Task Group
Educator Development
| Educator Development |
Build strong competence base; create global leadership opportunities; incentivise the community |
Build strong stakeholder advocacy base; educator development and rewards; international exchanges |
The Development Agenda:
- The future development of the field will require leaders in entrepreneurship education and existing educators are seeking further continuing professional development opportunities.
- There is a need to embed a deeper conceptual understanding of entrepreneurship within an education context as well as to extend the tool-bag of the entrepreneurial educator.
- Assist and help develop models for incentives designed to enable the development of entrepreneurship educators.
Key Goals for the Community:
- develop a growing base of leaders in entrepreneurship education
- establish rewards and recognition for exemplar educators
Next Steps:
- establish international leadership development opportunities for entrepreneurship educators
- enhance the support for the community of entrepreneurship practitioners through online opportunities
- in the UK, establish an stakeholder advocacy group for enhancing educator development
- explore opportunities for international exchange of educators
- explore opportunities for recognizing/rewarding excellence in entrepreneurship education
International Relations
| International Relations |
Develop a global capacity for sharing and learning with Kauffman and partners |
Capture and promote international Good Practice; comparative mapping studies |
The Development Agenda:
- Entrepreneurship education has been evolving around the world for the past few decades. A wealth of experience and practice exists and can be shared more widely.
- The NCGE online mapping template can be made available for use in different languages thereby creating comparative data on the international landscape for entrepreneurship education
Key Goals for the Community:
- A better understanding of the global experiences and practices in entrepreneurship education
- Increased partnership with the international community
- Increased sharing of international good practice
Next Steps:
- Further develop the partnership with Kauffman to explore additional opportunities for mapping and good practice projects
- Continue to work with existing international partners to conduct mapping studies and further good practice studies
- Extend the international partnerships into new areas
|